It's amazing how these magistrates attempt to obfuscate the most basic of things. 1. There is in-personam jurisdiction, i.e. jurisdiction over the "person" (a "person" being a corporate name only -- rendered in all capital letters).
2. Subject matter jurisdiction presumes in-personam jurisdiction exists first. But if no "subject matter" jurisdiction exists, then no in-personam exists. The two go hand-in-hand, therefore you can't have one without the other in order for a case to proceed.
Unfortunately, most Americans fail to understand, let alone remember, that the courts we have today, both state and federal -- are under public policy (established by ruling of the Supreme Court in 1938) to supersede public law which existed up to the corporate US bankruptcy in 1933. Public policy is outside of common law, therefore NO ONE in the flesh may be represented, let alone even present themselves. All parties to an action are "corporate" in nature, i.e. dead and fictional entities. Attorneys may ONLY represent dead fictional corporate names, and parties without attorney representation may ONLY RE-present their own corporate dead fictional names. Thus NO ONE appearing as a party in court has any unalienable rights whatever, since only the corporate names are represented, that are dead entities, possessing no rights whatever.
Live, sentient and fleshly sovereign Americans possess unalienable rights, some supported by the US Constitution. However, if ANY sovereignty possessing American national sets foot in ANY courtroom, even via "special appearance", the courts acknowledge that unalienable rights are left outside the courtroom door. All who enter in, unless extremely careful, will allow the magistrate to use word games to befuddle parties who claim unalienable rights, and trap them in word games to a verbal contract -- which enables "joinder" of the fleshly sovereign with the fictional dead entity listed in all cap letters.
Why even go there? The magistrates of any courts do NOT conduct these tribunals as impartial entities. No courts in the United States are part of the de jure government, because ALL are private agencies, allowed to practice by the corporate State, which turns a blind eye to the fact that ALL courts are part of the various BAR Associations, which ultimately owe allegiance to the Lawyer's Guild in the City of London, an overseas foreign and predatory organization, which is waging war upon all Americans who are gulled into presuming that they may receive justice in these criminally-acting charades called courts.
The magistrates are called "your honor" -- when everything they do is towards conducting business, wherein all fleshly "defendants" present are potential victims of a giant scam operation, which all the bar attorneys are privy to, including the magistrates. The courts are predatory only, and the magistrates collaborate with attorneys who face the fleshly parties -- whom are presumed by the court to be RE-presenting their dead fictional corporate names.
All court rooms represent an arena of predatory beasts (magistrates and bar attorneys) who prey upon the fleshly people entering therein, thinking they will receive "due process" and respect for constitutional principle -- when that's nothing farther from truth.
'Best to prepare and record documents called affidavits of Notice of Withdrawal of Consent, which formally declare that sovereignty is retained, but the affiants cannot recognize, let alone accommodate corporate entities which act as government, when they are not of government. Why have ANYTHING whatever to do with them? The documents recorded constitute a condition precedent, and a copy may be submitted to the clerk of court, to indicate that no participation in any court proceeding is agreed to, nor ever will be again.
by Robyna Choleton
2. Subject matter jurisdiction presumes in-personam jurisdiction exists first. But if no "subject matter" jurisdiction exists, then no in-personam exists. The two go hand-in-hand, therefore you can't have one without the other in order for a case to proceed.
Unfortunately, most Americans fail to understand, let alone remember, that the courts we have today, both state and federal -- are under public policy (established by ruling of the Supreme Court in 1938) to supersede public law which existed up to the corporate US bankruptcy in 1933. Public policy is outside of common law, therefore NO ONE in the flesh may be represented, let alone even present themselves. All parties to an action are "corporate" in nature, i.e. dead and fictional entities. Attorneys may ONLY represent dead fictional corporate names, and parties without attorney representation may ONLY RE-present their own corporate dead fictional names. Thus NO ONE appearing as a party in court has any unalienable rights whatever, since only the corporate names are represented, that are dead entities, possessing no rights whatever.
Live, sentient and fleshly sovereign Americans possess unalienable rights, some supported by the US Constitution. However, if ANY sovereignty possessing American national sets foot in ANY courtroom, even via "special appearance", the courts acknowledge that unalienable rights are left outside the courtroom door. All who enter in, unless extremely careful, will allow the magistrate to use word games to befuddle parties who claim unalienable rights, and trap them in word games to a verbal contract -- which enables "joinder" of the fleshly sovereign with the fictional dead entity listed in all cap letters.
Why even go there? The magistrates of any courts do NOT conduct these tribunals as impartial entities. No courts in the United States are part of the de jure government, because ALL are private agencies, allowed to practice by the corporate State, which turns a blind eye to the fact that ALL courts are part of the various BAR Associations, which ultimately owe allegiance to the Lawyer's Guild in the City of London, an overseas foreign and predatory organization, which is waging war upon all Americans who are gulled into presuming that they may receive justice in these criminally-acting charades called courts.
The magistrates are called "your honor" -- when everything they do is towards conducting business, wherein all fleshly "defendants" present are potential victims of a giant scam operation, which all the bar attorneys are privy to, including the magistrates. The courts are predatory only, and the magistrates collaborate with attorneys who face the fleshly parties -- whom are presumed by the court to be RE-presenting their dead fictional corporate names.
All court rooms represent an arena of predatory beasts (magistrates and bar attorneys) who prey upon the fleshly people entering therein, thinking they will receive "due process" and respect for constitutional principle -- when that's nothing farther from truth.
'Best to prepare and record documents called affidavits of Notice of Withdrawal of Consent, which formally declare that sovereignty is retained, but the affiants cannot recognize, let alone accommodate corporate entities which act as government, when they are not of government. Why have ANYTHING whatever to do with them? The documents recorded constitute a condition precedent, and a copy may be submitted to the clerk of court, to indicate that no participation in any court proceeding is agreed to, nor ever will be again.
by Robyna Choleton